02 / Current section

Domain builder, stabilizer or expansionist

Three paths with different horizons, reserve targets and succession risk.

Question answered here
Which operating mode fits my succession risk?
What you get
Get an order through the next review point
Context1.19.0.6checked 2026-08-19
Three operating modes

The same map requires a different order of actions

Every route starts with constraints, ends at a review point and opens a model where the plan can be tested.

3
02 / Dynasty builder

Build a resilient core, not the largest realm

For a calmer campaign focused on domain compounding, controllable wars and clean transfers of power.

Starting conditionsWarsreserve-gatedDomaincoreRiskmedium
Action order
1

Strengthen core holdingsInvest where the main line is likely to retain control.

2

Fund one objectiveA war or activity receives a budget, not the whole treasury.

3

Transfer a bufferEnd the reign with a cash floor for the heir.

Open route model →
03 / Realm optimizer

Optimize gold around wars and transfers of power

For a complex empire with several spending layers where risk-adjusted treasury matters.

Starting conditionsHorizon120 monthsCasesbase + stressReservedynamic
Action order
1

Separate spending layersPeace, war, activities and succession need separate outflow assumptions.

2

Model the marginal buildingJudge the next slot by income delta, not total holding income.

3

Stress-test successionAdd a faction war and transition cost to the downside case.

Open route model →
Method and freshness

Version fact on one layer. Your inputs on another.

The primary source defines patch or event context. Every editable price, horizon, probability and risk remains a user input.

Decision context

This is not an isolated page. It is part of a game route.

The playbook shows what has been checked, which layer comes next and where the decision becomes action.

01 / ROUTES